April 13, 2009
April 11, 2009
March 16, 2009
trigger
February 27, 2009
the dependency clause of the shadow equation (Vespers 90.1)
To Sheila Murphy, based on a concept shared by Sheila in sAyingsometHing
2 many memories disrobe once distortion | ||
precipitates | ||
heads with a pantonime of despondency |
February 25, 2009
February 23, 2009
February 12, 2009
amebsa(p,y,pb,yb,ftol,func,iter,temptr)
SUBROUTINE amebsa private
amotsa = yflu
END FUNCTION amotsa
END SUBROUTINE amebsa
January 30, 2009
January 26, 2009
predestination / karma / reincarnation
Some agnostics define death as:
death = life – life axiom 1)
In many religions the believe is there is something after or above death. This could be written as:
death ≠ 0 axiom 2)
Now if axiom 1 and axiom 2 are simultaneous valid, this leads to the postulate:
life ≠ life
This looks contradictory, however if we introduce the element time, axiom 1 could be written as:
death = life(n+1) – life(n),
where n is the current life. Moving variables yields: life(n+1) = life(n) + death. This could be written as:
next life = this life + death (predestination)
or
this life = next life – death This formula looks a bit strange, however this is due to semantics. If we take into account that time is not necessarily linear we could replace the word ‘next’ by the word ‘another’.
This leads to:
this life = another life – death (karma)
created for Mathematical Poetry
January 21, 2009
January 15, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)